Scanners give you findings. Your supervisor wants evidence. Assembling it by hand costs your team 40+ hours per audit cycle — breachr generates it as the test runs.
Designed by red teamers. Executed by agents. Validated by humans.
You get tested the way you'd actually be attacked — not the way a scanner works through a checklist.
Designed by red teamers
Every attack path in the engine originates from accredited offensive engagements: exploit chaining, privilege escalation, credential abuse, business-logic attacks mapped to MITRE ATT&CK — not a CVE checklist.
Executed by agents
Agentic AI runs that tradecraft continuously across your full attack surface, at a scale and cadence no human team can match.
Validated by humans
A CREST-credentialed tester confirms exploitability and business impact on every critical and high finding before it reaches your dashboard — the standard threat-led frameworks like TIBER-EU expect.
The methodology itself is documented and cryptographically signed — your answer when the QSA or supervisor asks “show me how you test.”
Three Tiers of Testing. One Platform.
Same product, attacker's-perspective throughout. Start with a URL. Add credentials. Upload source code. Each tier escalates in depth — all launched with one click.
How an external attacker with nothing but your URL would begin.
Just a URL — no setup, no credentials. breachr's agentic testing engine maps your attack surface against the OWASP Top 10 automatically. Free, with 2 scans per month.
How an attacker with a stolen credential would move.
Provide test credentials and the engine probes your app from the inside — login flows, authenticated endpoints, session handling, privilege escalation. Human-validated results.
How an attacker who has read your code would strike.
Upload your repo and get the deepest pentest available — static + dynamic correlation, business logic testing, PoC exploits. All compliance frameworks covered.
Humans + AI don't just find your vulnerabilities. They price them.
Every critical finding ships with a Business Risk Evaluation: exploitability confirmed by a CREST-credentialed tester, estimated exposure modelled in euros — regulatory fines, customer impact, remediation cost — and the exact DORA article or PCI DSS requirement it violates.
The report your CISO needs and the number your CFO and board can act on, in the same document.
Exposure figures are modelled estimates anchored to statutory penalty maxima; commercial impact is a scenario range with assumptions in the report. Not financial or legal advice.
| Regulatory fines (GDPR Art. 83) | €18–36M |
| Customer churn (modelled) | €3–7M |
| Remediation & legal | €0.4–1.1M |
| Reputational impact | High |
DORA doesn't hold your security team accountable. It holds your board.
DORA places ICT-risk accountability on the management body itself. breachr reports are written twice in one document: technical depth for the CISO, and quantified risk — mapped to PCI DSS Req. 12.3 documented risk analysis — for the executives who carry that accountability and sign.
Built for the person who signs your compliance report
What your auditor will ask — and what breachr hands you. Seven capabilities behind every evidence pack.
Sovereign Deployment
Testing runs inside your environment — EU sovereign cloud, your own cloud account, or air-gapped on-premise. Card data and sensitive systems never leave your control, so your scope stays defensible to your QSA.
Cryptographic LLM Audit Trail
SHA-256 + RSA-2048 signature on every AI finding. An auditor can verify which model found what, when, and with what confidence. Tamper-proof by design.
Article-Level Mapping
Every finding maps to the specific article or requirement it violates — DORA Art. 24–26, PCI DSS Req. 11.4, NIS2 Art. 21 — so the assessor sees exactly which control the evidence answers.
Regional Isolation
Data stays in-region with network-level isolation and zero cross-border transfer — Frankfurt by default, your region on request. GDPR Article 48 aligned.
Red-Team-Designed, AI-Executed
Attack vectors designed by CREST-credentialed red teamers, run continuously by agentic AI, human-validated before you see them. Autonomous-agent tools cannot deliver a compliant TLPT alone — this hybrid model is architected to.
Evidence Automation
50+ page DORA / PCI DSS / NIS2 / HIPAA evidence packs generated as the test runs, each finding mapped to the requirement it answers — the 40+ hours of manual assembly per audit cycle, eliminated.
Regulated-Vertical Focus
Built for EU-regulated financial services and HealthTech — the frameworks, the supervisory language, and the evidence formats your assessor expects, not a generic scanner retrofitted for compliance.
One test cycle. Two evidence packs.
Supervised under DORA and assessed under PCI DSS? You're asked to prove the same testing twice. breachr runs one programme and hands you both.
| What breachr does | Your DORA supervisor receives | Your PCI QSA receives |
|---|---|---|
| Threat-led testing of your estate | Art. 26 TLPT-aligned engagement evidence | Req. 11.4 penetration test report |
| Tests inside your environment / CDE | Sovereign-deployment attestation | Req. 11.4.5/11.4.6 segmentation evidence |
| Signs every finding cryptographically | Tamper-evident audit trail | Chain of custody for the ROC |
| Prices each finding as business risk | Board-ready ICT-risk quantification | Req. 12.3 targeted risk analysis |
Covers Every Compliance Framework
Click to explore what breachr delivers for each regulation
Operating in more than one region? PCI DSS is the same standard in Frankfurt, London, Cape Town, and Singapore — and breachr produces the same QSA-ready evidence pack in all of them, with local billing in EUR and ZAR.
Ready to Pass Your Next Audit?
Join compliance teams using breachr to produce evidence their supervisor and QSA can act on — DORA, PCI DSS, NIS2, and HIPAA on EU infrastructure.